So we can all agree, after all.
The CICC is a beautiful structure, and its construction was an engineering feat the likes of which Cebu had never known.
After its editor picked a fight with them, SunStar Cebu cited the builders of the CICC as “Citizens of the Year”.
CDN called the CICC a “resplendent sight” on the 12th Asean Summit’s opening day, despite the reported lack of a fire inspection certificate. (Of course, CDN omits to mention that it had been occupying its new offices at the North Reclamation Area for a full nine months before it was finally issued an occupancy permit. Is there an inspection for double standards?)
I don’t know if Leo Lastimosa has taken back his put-down that the facade of the CICC is “mura’g dagway sa yawa” (like the face of the Devil). But, as a texter aptly pointed out, that’s one thing over which we can never argue with Leo Lastimosa. The Devil hasn’t shown his face to us; apparently the Devil has, to Leo Lastimosa.
But whatever bedevils this sad few, the verdict is in: CICC looks great, and it makes us proud to be Cebuanos.
Is the CICC looks great to you? Bullshit. I am a Cebuano and all I can say is, don’t deceieved me. I know what you are about to say about me, devil. Anybaody who will criticize the CICC will be called a devil? Is it right for the rah-rah boys and from Gwen?roland lejarde